| Bonds Online |
 |
|
| 5/10/2013Market Performance |
| Municipal Bonds |
|---|
|
S&P National Bond Index
|
3.00% |
|
|
S&P California Bond Index
|
2.96% |
|
|
S&P New York Bond Index
|
3.13% |
|
|
S&P National 0-5 Year Municipal Bond Index
|
0.70% |
|
|
| S&P/BGCantor US Treasury Bond |
400.09 |
|
| More |
|
| Income Equities: |
|---|
| Preferred Stocks |
|---|
|
S&P U.S. Preferred Stock Index
|
848.03 |
|
|
S&P U.S. Preferred Stock Index (CAD)
|
636.26 |
|
|
S&P U.S. Preferred Stock Index (TR)
|
1,701.05 |
|
|
S&P U.S. Preferred Stock Index (TR) (CAD)
|
1,276.26 |
|
|
| REITs |
|---|
|
S&P REIT Index
|
174.07 |
|
|
S&P REIT Index (TR)
|
425.30 |
|
|
| MLPs |
|---|
|
S&P MLP Index
|
2,469.58 |
|
|
S&P MLP Index (TR)
|
5,428.50 |
|
|
See Data
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bond ETF Buyers Must Stay on Guard for Hidden Risks |
WSJ.com - Feb. 27, 2010 - by Sam Mamudi
Investors seeking safety have been pouring cash into bond funds over most of the past year. While that can be a sound if not lucrative strategy when it comes to mutual funds, exchange-traded bond funds bring the risk of limiting gains or magnifying losses.
ETFs are seen as liquid, transparent investment and trading vehicles. But liquidity issues make most bonds a poor fit for ETFs, so an ETF's share price, dictated by market demand, is often different from its net asset value. As a result, investors often aren't buying and selling fund shares at levels close to their true value.
The problem is "an inherent flaw in non-Treasury bond ETFs," said Matt Hougan, managing director of ETF analytics for Index Publications. "The corporate-bond market is notoriously illiquid."
And given ETFs' need for liquidity, he said, "it's a square peg in a round hole."
The difference between the price and the value of the bond ETF shares is increasingly important after a year that saw the funds rake in assets and ahead of what many analysts expect will be a tough bond market as interest rates start to rise. The likelihood is that many investors bought into the ETFs at a premium and could beat a retreat as the bond market turns, at which point they'll be selling below NAV.
"If you buy the shares at a premium, you have to be careful you don't sell it at a discount," said David Levy, portfolio manager at Austin, Texas-based Kenjol Capital Management.
Take a look at SPDR Barclays Capital High Yield Bond ETF (trading symbol: JNK) to see how bond ETF share prices can move differently to their value.
At the close of trading on Friday, Feb. 19, the SPDR shares traded at almost a 1% premium to net asset value. Each share based on the ETF's holdings was worth $38.28; the shares closed the day at $38.65. By Tuesday afternoon, the fund's shares traded at a slight discount to NAV. What's more, by mid-afternoon on Tuesday, the fund's share price had fallen about 1% from the open while its NAV, the measure of the value of its assets, was up 0.6%. But by this past Friday, the shares were back at a premium, closing at $38.79 compared with their NAV of $38.34.
"Investors aren't making the investment they thought they were," Mr. Levy said. "They want the underlying securities, not the buy-sell value of the market."
Mr. Levy's firm avoids bond ETFs, choosing instead bond mutual funds, where shares are always priced at NAV.
The choppy markets and growing popularity of bond ETFs have highlighted the dislocation between the price and the value of their shares.
Bond ETFs saw almost $60 billion in net inflows in 2009, a near-50% rise in assets and well ahead of the $19 billion that went to stock ETFs, according to fund tracker Lipper Inc. The inflows have created demand that pushed bond ETF shares to premiums.
It's not just about premiums, though. In the fourth quarter of last year another high-yield bond ETF, (HYG), posted both premiums and discounts to its share value. On Dec. 14, the premium peaked at 2.15%, while on Oct. 1 it was trading at a discount of 0.9%. Through the quarter the ETF saw only five of 64 trading days when the ETF's share price was within 0.5% of its net asset value.
The swings were even wider in the first quarter of 2009. The iShares fund had several days during that period when premiums were more than 6% of NAV and also saw occasions when discounts were greater than 3%. In the same quarter, SPDR Barclays Capital High Yield Bond ETF swung from premium of more 12% on Jan. 5, 2009, to a discount of 4.9% on March 2.
"Bond ETFs offer a different set of trade-offs for an investor" compared with mutual funds, said Matthew Tucker, head of fixed-income investing strategy at iShares, a unit of BlackRock Inc. He pointed as an example to ETFs' lower costs and greater transparency.
And premiums and discounts cut both ways. Just as inflows pushed up premiums last year, once interest rates rise and bonds lose appeal, the selloff in these funds will lead to discounts, meaning the shares will be sold for less than their underlying value.
"Premiums were large last year [because of bond ETFs' popularity], but when people rush out next year when rates go up it could cause discounts," Mr. Hougan said.
He added that investors should be "nervous" about a bond ETF with a premium or discount of 1% or more from its NAV.
That said, investors shouldn't necessarily avoid bond ETFs. "You need to weigh the differences," Mr. Hougan said. "Mutual funds are usually more expensive and slightly less tax efficient."
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Partner Market Place |
|
|
|
| Stuff to look at |
Yield and Income Newsletter: A must have for income investors. subscribe NOW
S&P Commentary and Newsletters: S&P
|
|
| BondsOnline Advisor |
Income Security Recommendation January 2013 Issue.
Keep up with monthly, in-depth coverage of fixed income market strategies, commentary, and insights as seen by our sources. Sign up for the free BondsOnline Advisor now!
Unsubscribe here [+] |
|
|
|
|
