|
|
|
|
| BondsOnline.com: instant access to and extensive coverage of over 3.5 million stocks, bonds, indexes and other securities covering major and emerging markets and exchanges across the globe. |
|
|
| Bonds Online |
|
|
| 5/10/2013Market Performance |
| Municipal Bonds |
|---|
|
S&P National Bond Index
|
3.00% |
|
|
S&P California Bond Index
|
2.96% |
|
|
S&P New York Bond Index
|
3.13% |
|
|
S&P National 0-5 Year Municipal Bond Index
|
0.70% |
|
|
| S&P/BGCantor US Treasury Bond |
400.09 |
|
| More |
|
| Income Equities: |
|---|
| Preferred Stocks |
|---|
|
S&P U.S. Preferred Stock Index
|
848.03 |
|
|
S&P U.S. Preferred Stock Index (CAD)
|
636.26 |
|
|
S&P U.S. Preferred Stock Index (TR)
|
1,701.05 |
|
|
S&P U.S. Preferred Stock Index (TR) (CAD)
|
1,276.26 |
|
|
| REITs |
|---|
|
S&P REIT Index
|
174.07 |
|
|
S&P REIT Index (TR)
|
425.30 |
|
|
| MLPs |
|---|
|
S&P MLP Index
|
2,469.58 |
|
|
S&P MLP Index (TR)
|
5,428.50 |
|
|
See Data
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Are Corporate Bonds a Good Investment? |
Moneywatch.com - June 2, 2010 - By Larry Swedroe
At the end of 2008, there were many articles pointing out that stocks had not outperformed bonds during the past 40-year period. However, there was much less written about another missing risk premium — the corporate risk premium.
For the period 1969-2008, the S&P 500 Index and 20-year Treasury bonds both returned 9.0 percent, with the S&P 500 experiencing far greater volatility (15.4 percent versus 10.6 percent). While the fact that stocks could underperform Treasuries for 40 years surprised many people, it really shouldn’t have. The reason is that no matter how long the horizon, there must be the risk that stocks will underperform safer investments. Otherwise, there would be no risk.
However, the lack of a corporate risk premium received very little attention. Over the same period, 20-year corporate bonds returned 8.4 percent per year, underperforming the 9.0 percent returns of 20-year Treasury bonds. The fact that there was no corporate credit risk premium at a time that there was no equity risk premium really should not surprise investors because corporate bonds are really hybrid securities (a mix of stocks and Treasury bonds) that don’t have all that much unique risk in them.
The more surprising finding is the following. For the period 1926-2009, the riskier S&P 500 provided a significant return premium over safer long-term Treasuries, outperforming them by 4.4 percent per year (9.8 versus 5.4). Over the same period, riskier long-term corporate bonds outperformed safer long-term Treasuries, but by just 0.4 percent — 5.8 percent versus 5.4 percent. That doesn’t seem to be much of a premium for the additional risk.
As we have discussed many times, you shouldn’t consider assets in isolation. Instead, you should consider how their addition impacts your portfolio’s risk and return. The following table covers the period 1926-2009, and compares the results of two 60/40 portfolios that are rebalanced annually. Portfolio A’s allocation is 60 percent S&P 500/40 percent long-term corporate bonds. Portfolio B substitutes long-term Treasury bonds for the fixed income allocation.
While long-term corporate bonds outperformed long-term Treasuries, adding long-term Treasuries instead of long-term corporates produced a slightly more efficient portfolio. The evidence demonstrates that the risks of Treasuries mix better with the risks of stocks than do the risks of corporates bonds.
On Friday, we’ll look at some other factors that make the picture even less favorable for corporate bonds.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Partner Market Place |
|
|
|
| Stuff to look at |
Yield and Income Newsletter: A must have for income investors. subscribe NOW
S&P Commentary and Newsletters: S&P
|
|
| BondsOnline Advisor |
Income Security Recommendation January 2013 Issue.
Keep up with monthly, in-depth coverage of fixed income market strategies, commentary, and insights as seen by our sources. Sign up for the free BondsOnline Advisor now!
Unsubscribe here [+] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
