| Bonds Online |
 |
 |
| 5/10/2013Market Performance |
| Municipal Bonds |
|
S&P National Bond Index
|
3.00% |
|
|
S&P California Bond Index
|
2.96% |
|
|
S&P New York Bond Index
|
3.13% |
|
|
S&P National 0-5 Year Municipal Bond Index
|
0.70% |
|
|
| S&P/BGCantor US Treasury Bond |
400.09 |
|
| More |
|
| Income Equities: |
| Preferred Stocks |
|
S&P U.S. Preferred Stock Index
|
848.03 |
|
|
S&P U.S. Preferred Stock Index (CAD)
|
636.26 |
|
|
S&P U.S. Preferred Stock Index (TR)
|
1,701.05 |
|
|
S&P U.S. Preferred Stock Index (TR) (CAD)
|
1,276.26 |
|
|
| REITs |
|
S&P REIT Index
|
174.07 |
|
|
S&P REIT Index (TR)
|
425.30 |
|
|
| MLPs |
|
S&P MLP Index
|
2,469.58 |
|
|
S&P MLP Index (TR)
|
5,428.50 |
|
|
See Data
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
Bubble Builds in Bonds |
THE WALL STREET JOURNAL - JUNE 7, 2010 - By SAM MAMUDI
They say that bad things come in threes, and in the past decade investors have seen two market bubbles burst. Now some money managers believe a third downturn is in the making—in bonds.
And just as the previous losses were made worse by investors rushing headlong into assets that showed signs of overheating, bond prices are being inflated by investors pouring cash in at record rates.
Yet unlike the tech-stock and credit-fueled bubbles that resulted from eager buyers chasing returns, this latest bubble is forming in part because frightened investors want to minimize risk and avoid further losses.
History Lesson
After the fall of technology stocks in 2000 and the financial crisis of 2008, many investors shunned stocks and headed for the perceived safety of fixed income. But that stampede into bonds, coupled with changes in the economy, threatens investors with losses in their longer-term bond funds.
That is because interest rates will likely rise in coming years from a base of almost zero today. Higher rates slam bond values. But investors mostly only know what they have seen in the past 25 years, which for the most part has been a period of steadily declining interest rates and rising bond prices.
Moreover, the flood of cash cascading into bond funds forces managers to buy securities in a low-rate environment. When rates move higher and the value of their bond holdings slides, many fund investors are likely to head for the exits—further baking in losses as managers are forced to sell to meet redemptions.
"It's fallacious reasoning that you can't lose money in bonds," said James Swanson, chief investment strategist at MFS Investment Management.
But investors seem oblivious to the danger, in part perhaps because bond funds haven't suffered such large losses in recent years.
From 1985 through 2009, bond-fund returns, on average, dipped into negative territory just three times, with losses of 4.7% in 1994, 1.2% in 1999 and a 7.8% decline in 2008, according to investment-research firm Morningstar Inc.
U.S. stock funds, by contrast, had six losing years, including tumbles of 12% in 2001, 23% in 2002 and 39% in 2008.
"People are conditioned to push the 'fixed-income' button [in times of trouble] because for nearly 30 years you didn't have to do anything to make money," said Bill Eigen, manager of J.P. Morgan Strategic Income Opportunities Fund (trading symbol JSOAX), a bond fund with a flexible, go-anywhere approach.
Those smaller losses were enticing for investors reeling from 2008's heavy shelling. In 2009, bond funds saw a record $375 billion of new money come in, ending the year with $2.2 trillion in assets, according to the Investment Company Institute. By contrast, domestic stock funds saw $40 billion go out the door, ending the year with $3.7 trillion in assets.
Many investors may be surprised to hear that bond funds could be so vulnerable, in part because if one holds a bond to maturity the full principal is returned.
Not so with bond funds, which typically don't hold bonds to maturity. A long-term bond fund, for example, needs to keep its average holding maturity several years out, in part to keep yields up, so it cycles through bonds. Fund flows also play a part—managers often need to buy and sell securities depending on the cash going in and out of the fund.
Interest-rate increases may be many months away, but at that point bond-fund managers could have trouble as demand for lower-yielding securities becomes scarce and prices fall.
Compounding the problem is that many investors don't remember when bond funds did lose money for a prolonged period.
"A multiyear move of rising interest rates is an environment that most people haven't seen before," said Tom Atteberry, co-manager of FPA New Income Fund (FPNIX).
Short View
Investors determined to avoid stocks in a volatile market should invest in shorter-term bond funds—perhaps with five-year durations—that can at least keep pace with inflation, and wait out uncertainty in the economy and the markets, Mr. Atteberry said.
Once stability returns, stocks could shine in a higher-rate environment.
Susan Fulton, president of Bethesda, Md.-based wealth manager FBB Capital Partners, said she tells clients they need a minimum of 30% invested in stocks to beat long-term inflation risk.
A portfolio divided equally between stocks and bonds is the "sweet spot" in terms of delivering returns proportionate to risk, Ms. Fulton added. Most of the bonds she holds, she said, mature in less than seven years, and she uses either exchange-traded funds or individual bonds rather than mutual funds.
"People heading into long-term bonds think they're going there for safety, but they're making a very aggressive bet," said Ms. Fulton. "You need to diversify."
|
|
|
|
|
 |
| Partner Market Place |
 |

|
 |
| Stuff to look at |
Yield and Income Newsletter: A must have for income investors. subscribe NOW
S&P Commentary and Newsletters: S&P
|
 |
| BondsOnline Advisor |
Income Security Recommendation January 2013 Issue.
Keep up with monthly, in-depth coverage of fixed income market strategies, commentary, and insights as seen by our sources. Sign up for the free BondsOnline Advisor now!
Unsubscribe here [+] |
 |
|
|
|