|
|
|
|
| BondsOnline.com: instant access to and extensive coverage of over 3.5 million stocks, bonds, indexes and other securities covering major and emerging markets and exchanges across the globe. |
|
|
| Bonds Online |
|
|
| 5/10/2013Market Performance |
| Municipal Bonds |
|---|
|
S&P National Bond Index
|
3.00% |
|
|
S&P California Bond Index
|
2.96% |
|
|
S&P New York Bond Index
|
3.13% |
|
|
S&P National 0-5 Year Municipal Bond Index
|
0.70% |
|
|
| S&P/BGCantor US Treasury Bond |
400.09 |
|
| More |
|
| Income Equities: |
|---|
| Preferred Stocks |
|---|
|
S&P U.S. Preferred Stock Index
|
848.03 |
|
|
S&P U.S. Preferred Stock Index (CAD)
|
636.26 |
|
|
S&P U.S. Preferred Stock Index (TR)
|
1,701.05 |
|
|
S&P U.S. Preferred Stock Index (TR) (CAD)
|
1,276.26 |
|
|
| REITs |
|---|
|
S&P REIT Index
|
174.07 |
|
|
S&P REIT Index (TR)
|
425.30 |
|
|
| MLPs |
|---|
|
S&P MLP Index
|
2,469.58 |
|
|
S&P MLP Index (TR)
|
5,428.50 |
|
|
See Data
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate Bond ETFs: Priced for Perfect Convenience? |
Seeking Alpha - Oct. 7, 2009
Tuesday’s Wall St. Journal article on bond ETF pricing grabbed immediate front-page attention on Seeking Alpha, a righteous sign of these investments’ popularity and the site’s always-on radar systems.
Briefly, the WSJ article points out that popular corporate bond ETFs, including both the iShares short-term investment grade ETF (CSJ) and its long-term ETF (LQD), and the SPDR high-yield ETF (JNK) can trade at significant premiums to their underlying assets, as well as fall short of the returns of their respective indexes.
Both the WSJ article and an SA contributor pinpoint some clear insights on these issues. Among them, bonds don’t trade on transparent exchanges and some of the bonds in the underlying indexes don’t trade much at all.
And that can lead to pricing discrepancies as well as real differences between the ETFs’ holdings and the indexes’ components. In explaining the recent underperformance of JNK, for example, a spokesman said the ETF was simply unable to buy some of the lower-quality bonds that helped goose the index higher.
That said, let me slip another duck onto the pond, perhaps a lighter one, but at least worth considering.
The price premiums on these ETFs are at least partly a ‘convenience premium’ investors are willing to pay because some of the demand for corporate bonds simply cannot be met through buying the underlying assets or indexes (which the ETFs cannot even buy, as the JNK spokesman pointed out).
Specifically, for individual investors and I imagine some small or midsize money-managers as well, buying the indexes themselves is not a real alternative anyway, and wading into the pool far enough to assemble a decent portfolio of individual corporate bonds gets into murky water fast.
Conversely, the instant diversification, stock-like commissions and low expense ratios (granted, not the only costs associated with the buy) of these ETFs provide enough convenience-value that investors figure the package is worth the price. In fairness, it might be noted that some open-ended mutual funds perhaps could do the job as well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Partner Market Place |
|
|
|
| Stuff to look at |
Yield and Income Newsletter: A must have for income investors. subscribe NOW
S&P Commentary and Newsletters: S&P
|
|
| BondsOnline Advisor |
Income Security Recommendation January 2013 Issue.
Keep up with monthly, in-depth coverage of fixed income market strategies, commentary, and insights as seen by our sources. Sign up for the free BondsOnline Advisor now!
Unsubscribe here [+] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
